​​转基因大豆油致癌之事 ，千万别听＠科技日报 马保平 的

作者：新浪微博 小崔读书汇 2018.10.20 

原文链接地址：https://card.weibo.com/article/v3/editor#/draft/527921

正文：

黑龙江王小语，读了全国肿瘤登记年报，发现了一个简单事实，哪里吃转基因大豆油多，哪里癌症发病率高。按常理，所有相关科学家和相关部门都该重视起来。

谁知，这个发现击中了转基因贩子和骗子的命门，它们跳得几丈高地“辟谣”。按它们的说法癌症多，说明生活好人长寿，万恶的旧社会，还没幸福地得癌就死去。另外，王小语的发现，只能说明转基因油和癌症有相关性，但不是因果关系。总之，“按照科学说法，到目前为止，没有任何证据证明转基因食品对消费者的健康造成危害……转基因大豆致癌说完全没有流行病学的证据。”

王小语可以问一句，海量涌入中国的、草甘膦残留量不加限制的转基因大豆，什么时候、什么地方谁组织进行了相关的流行病学调查？啥都没做，凭什么说“转基因大豆致癌说完全没有流行病学的证据”？单说病人救命吃的药物，上市前都要做三期临床实验，都是以年为计算单位的。而转基因食品只给大鼠吃了三个月，就拍胸脯保证安全，要全中国人一起吃，还不准说不好，说不好就是愚昧，就是反科学，骂你们丫一句孙子是不是算轻的？

数据表明：江苏省吃很多转基因大豆油，紧挨着的山东吃花生油，江苏的癌症就比山东多；上海吃转基因大豆油，紧挨着的浙江吃菜籽油，上海癌症发病率就高。

如果有科学家或（科技日报）真心想证明转基因食品不致癌，必须用证据度最高的队列研究来为转基因食品洗白。几年到几十年，观察吃转基因大豆油和不吃的人，最后确定，这个暴露因素会不会致癌。流行病学专家告诉我，队列研究是研究因素与疾病远期效应的公认方法，一代人去世了，还可以继续随访他们的后代，转基因食品是否有害，包括是否致癌，应该做类似的队列研究。

现在这伙人只会说给老鼠吃了，给猪吃了，吃了九十天呢，皮红毛亮、行动自如。

我这个文科生再支个招，可以筛查一下癌症病人尿液中草甘膦浓度，这个是一个很好切入的、没有记忆偏倚的流行病学调查指标。

这些孙子从不敢做人体实验，就说做人体实验没意义，不符合科学界惯例。

这些孙子们不敢做流行病学调查，还敢张口就说没有发现一例转基因导致的食品安全问题。

这些孙子把人当老鼠看，把人当猪看，就是不把人当人看。

从方骗子开始就说草甘膦比食盐还安全、比五粮液还安全。马保平，咱俩喝一顿呗，你喝草甘膦，其它的我喝。

支持王小语的科学精神，依照目前的研究结果，我知道转基因大豆高残留的草甘膦是致癌的，所以转基因大豆油，吃不吃您看着办。

完

****************************

附原文英文版

Don't listen to Ma Baoping, Science and Technology Daily, about the carcinogenicity of genetically modified soybean oil

Xiao Cui Dushuhui

2018.10.20

Wang Xiaoyu of Heilongjiang Province read the annual report of national cancer registration and found a simple fact: where to eat more GM soybean oil, where the incidence of cancer is high. It is common sense that all relevant scientists and departments should attach importance to it.

Who knows, this discovery hit the doors of genetically modified traders and fraudsters, who jumped several feet to "dispel rumors". According to their statement, there are many cancers, which means that in the old society where good people live long lives and evil things, they died before they had cancer happily. In addition, Wang Xiaoyu's discovery can only explain the correlation between genetically modified oils and cancer, but it is not causal. In a word, "according to the scientific statement, so far, there is no evidence that GM food is harmful to consumers'health... There is no epidemiological evidence for the carcinogenicity of GM soybean.

Wang Xiaoyu can ask, when and where did the relevant epidemiological survey of GM soybeans with unrestricted Glyphosate Residues pour into China? Nothing has been done. Why is there no epidemiological evidence for the carcinogenic theory of GM soybeans? In terms of life-saving drugs for patients, three clinical trials should be conducted before they go on the market, all of which are based on years. But GM food only gives rats three months to eat, and then pats their breasts to ensure safety. If we want all Chinese people to eat together, we must not say that it is not good. If we say that it is not good, it is ignorant, it is anti-science. Is it light to scold your grandson?

The data show that Jiangsu Province eats a lot of GM soybean oil, and Shandong Province next to it has more cancer than Shandong Province; Shanghai eats GM soybean oil and Zhejiang next to it eats rapeseed oil, and Shanghai has a higher cancer incidence.

If a scientist or sci-tech daily really wants to prove that GM food is not carcinogenic, it is necessary to use the most highly evident cohort study to whiten GM food. For years to decades, people who ate GM soybean oil and did not eat it were observed to determine whether the exposure factor would cause cancer. Epidemiologists told me that cohort studies are an accepted way to study the long-term effects of factors and diseases. A generation has passed away and can continue to follow up their offspring to see if genetically modified foods are harmful, including carcinogenic, and a similar cohort study should be done.

Now the group will only say that they have eaten the pig, ate it for the pig, and ate it for ninety days.

My liberal arts student can take another step to screen the urine glyphosate concentration of cancer patients. This is a good entry, no memory bias epidemiological survey index.

These grandsons never dare to do human experiments, saying that human experiments are meaningless and do not conform to the conventions of the scientific community.

These grandchildren dare not do epidemiological investigation, and dare to say that there is no case of food safety problems caused by GM.

These grandchildren look at people as rats, and treat people as pigs. They do not regard human beings as human beings.

From the beginning, Fang Cheater said that glyphosate is safer than salt and Wuliangye. Ma Baoping, let's have a drink. You drink glyphosate and I drink the rest.

Supporting Wang Xiaoyu's scientific spirit, according to the current research results, I know that GM soybean high residual glyphosate is carcinogenic, so GM soybean oil, eat or not, you can see. ​​​

爱你们的@挽清念离别

更多转基因资讯点击：——》》《转基因论战资讯追踪》​​​​